The Sure Plan for Succession Failure in the Family Owned Business
It is not unusual to meet
the managing partner of a family owned business having difficulty addressing the transfer of his/her business to the next
generation. But to do so is to neglect the long-term survival of their business and increase the odds for its failure. For
problems of succession are indeed the greatest threats to the survival of family businesses. Market shifts, product liability
lawsuits, credit crunches, supply chain disruptions, information system failures—none of these can compare to the threat
of failing to plan for the transfer of family business ownership and leadership to the next generation.
Here are the disturbing
facts. Today some 75% of successful family businesses fail to survive through the second generation. Far fewer survive into
the third. Why? The most common reason is that the goals and objectives of the founding generation are rarely the same as
those of the succeeding generation. The next generation brings with it new dynamics, including an increasing number of family
members who are laying claim to the business. Failing to understand and adapt to the generational differences will bring an
end to any planning process.
However, a careful planning
process for ownership, leadership, and management in the business succession process will address these and many other related
issues. To ignore such concerns is simply a fundamental failure to plan for success. And to do so will prove to be tremendously
costly.
Comprehensive
planning for succession
Effective succession planning
does more than designate a family member as the next chief executive and training him or her for the job. Rather, it involves
a long-term, continuous effort to balance often competing interests and pressures that are integral to a family business.
These interests and pressures include not only the family members who are directly involved in running the day-to-day business,
but also non-family managers and family members who do not work in the business.
A successful planning process
is broad, and not narrow. To be effective, it must be both comprehensive and ongoing in order to identify the critical and
conflicting issues in the family business and identify a range of options for each issue. It should also attempt to force
submerged issues out into the open. These often include conflicts between parents, children, children's spouses, and other
family members over family business goals and how these goals relate to personal hopes and interests. In one case, the respected
owner of a large automobile dealership is still unwilling to allow his son to have full reign over the operations even though
the son has been effectively leading the dealerships growth for years. The reasons are more emotional than practical. They
are, however, just as real.
Experience has repeatedly
shown that successful planning efforts focus on the process of planning itself rather than on any particular outcome. The
establishment of an ongoing planning process encourages participants to clarify their often hazy goals to themselves and others.
This clarification of goals allows for further thought, discussion, and eventual decisions that are more clearly understood
by the participants. In this process, designated successors may discover an unwillingness to take over the family business
while other members – who have not been seriously considered – may find a growing excitement when considering
the possibility.
How best
to start the planning process
Unfortunately, succession
planning in family businesses often begins in response to an external event such as illness, accident, death, marriage, or
divorce. Ideally, planning should not begin as a reaction to a single event. It is very unlikely that good succession planning
can proceed, for example, during a major health emergency of the business leader or the period of mourning following the death
of a family member. Instead, leading family members should acknowledge the integral importance of succession planning to the
ongoing health of the business, the relations of family members to the business, and the relations of family members to each
other. The overall task can seem overwhelming unless the succession journey is mapped out one leg at a time.
Early in the planning process
the current business leader(s) should guide family members through a strategic planning process. Doing so will highlight the
major issues of succession planning and help participants see that theirs is hardly unique. This realization can open the
minds of many to considering solutions that have been successful for other family businesses.
As the planning process
unfolds, it is important to keep all family members informed about recent decisions, current issues, and future concerns.
Regular updates, such as a quarterly planning memo, can directly communicate important information to all involved. An old
axiom applies here—better solutions develop from better communications.
Most families find that
some members will take an active role in the business while others remain passive. The respective obligations and rewards
for such member should be explicitly defined. Though the definitions may be given by the current business leader, family members
should be able to weigh in with their own views. At times, a written set of “guiding principles” can help. For
example, I know of several family businesses who have written something akin to a “Values Charter” defining how
the family business will be run. In one Charter the commitment to rewarding those responsible for the growth of the business
– whether they are family members or non-family managers – is mentioned. There, the non-family members enjoy a
larger bonus than non-active family members.
Because of the conflicting
values guiding a family and a business, it may be helpful to use a third party advisor to guide the family through the succession
planning process. In facilitating the planning process, the advisor can help the family identify the relevant issues, including
the more hidden ones, while avoiding much of the interference that emerges from normal family emotions. The independent judgment
of the advisor can serve as a means to consider alternatives, resolve conflict, and overcome opposition.
Addressing
the needs of family members, managers, and owners
Major issues that the family
must ultimately resolve include such technical concerns as legal structures, share ownership arrangements, estate planning,
inheritance tax provisions, management succession, and compensation. These should be addressed after the larger goals and
vision for the family business has been set.
Once the overall direction
has been set, it becomes easier to sort through the myriad of decisions that must then be made. These include: motivation
and competence in the next generation, control during management transition, fair compensation to various children, potential
sibling conflicts (including sibling spouses), fear of family obligations, historical lack of commitment to promises, fundamental
differences in interests and personalities, etc., etc., ….
Only after family members
address their major concealed issues should they move on to resolving the technical ones. These matters need to be defined
in some detail in order to avoid misunderstandings and a future unraveling of settled points. For example, compensation plans
should distinguish between passive and active shareholders, family and external board members, family and outside managers,
family and non-family shareholders, etc. Furthermore, the compensation plan should specify principles and some details of
bonus systems, stock option plans, potential "A" and "B" shares, straight salaries, etc. Other specific provisions might include
methods of creating liquidity for children, the need for non-family directors, a specification of the appropriate roles for
family and non-family directors, and methods for conserving capital in the business.
Major consideration should
be given to establishing a family protocol to define the family's relationships to the business. These could perhaps feature
a statement of five-year goals and a set of rules that might include the sort of training expected of family members who become
executives. Should they have experience working outside the business? How should they circulate through different departments
of a larger business? Because successful family businesses have shown that making it "easy to get out" makes it "easy to stay
in," there should also be a clear set of rules on how to purchase the shares of family members who wish to cash out their
stake. There should also be guidelines established for the potential sale of the business as well as for its diversification.
Finally, the rules should
also include rules for changing rules, as well as for designating a third party as a "process arbitrator" to help in the case
of unresolved disagreements. Just as planning for succession is an ongoing process, a family protocol or business constitution
should be regarded as a living document that should periodically be revised.
As a family business leader,
you start out with the odds against you in transferring a successful business into the next generation. If you make a concerted
effort to plan for succession, you will reduce these daunting odds. And if you start the succession planning process early
and integrate the process into a normal, ongoing part of your business, you will considerably improve your chances for achieving
a successful generational transition.
The choice is yours. In
practical terms, a failure to plan for succession is simply a plan for failure.
Written by Paul R. Brown, M.A. Principal of Summit Advisory LLC.
All rights reserved.